New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link Anti-Empire — Shadow Banned by Google Tue Mar 02, 2021 19:12 | Anti-Empire

offsite link London Police Says COVID Rules No Longer... Tue Mar 02, 2021 16:16 | Robert Mendick

offsite link Lockdowns Have Killed Millions Tue Mar 02, 2021 15:24 | Sebastian Rushworth MD

offsite link Disarming the Deplorables Tue Mar 02, 2021 12:15 | Kevin Yuill

offsite link Western Governments Work to Strangle Fun... Tue Mar 02, 2021 11:30 | Terje Maloy

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Leaked: Smith College memo demands workers admit White privilege Wed Mar 03, 2021 01:04 | amarynth
by Ramin Mazaheri for the Saker Blog As a daily reporter, columnist and author it seems I have developed a reputation for unparalleled bravery in exposing truths which the 1%

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2021/03/02 ? Open Thread Tue Mar 02, 2021 15:30 | Herb Swanson
2021/03/02 15:30:01Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link Bernays and Propaganda ? The Transition to Education and Commerce ? Part 4 Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:16 | amarynth
By Larry Romanoff for the Saker Blog The success of Lippman and Bernays did not go unnoticed in many segments of American society. Universities in particular realised the potential of

offsite link Book review: ?Disintegration? by Andrei Martyanov Tue Mar 02, 2021 02:32 | The Saker
[this book review was written for the Unz Review] This is the third book by Andrei Martyanov that I am reviewing, the first one was ?Book Review – Losing Military

offsite link The ?Cancel Culture? phenomenon: kind of hate-hush all over the world Mon Mar 01, 2021 17:45 | amarynth
by Ghassan and Intibah Kadi for the Saker Blog Who remembers the Herman?s Hermits and their 1967 song ?There?s a Kind of Hush?? The hush the song speaks of is

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Mainstream media: Failing to speak truth to power

offsite link David Quinn’s selective tolerance Anthony

offsite link A Woulfe in judges clothing Anthony

offsite link Sarah McInerney and political impartiality Anthony

offsite link Did RTE journalists collude against Sinn Fein? Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

offsite link Turkish President Calls On Greece To Comply With Human Rights on Syrian Refugee Issues Wed Mar 04, 2020 17:58 | Human Rights

offsite link US Holds China To Account For Human Rights Violations Sun Oct 13, 2019 19:12 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Up to 90% of people who test positive for Covid barely carry any virus & are not contagious. Every stat about the disease is bogus

category international | health / disability issues | other press author Friday September 04, 2020 11:32author by 1 of indyReport this post to the editors

Are we surprised by this headline from this report written by Peter Andrews an Irish science journalist and writer based in London?

It has been revealed that the standard tests being used in the US to diagnose Covid-19 cases are far too sensitive, with the vast majority of people marked down as being positive actually turning out to be negative

We can be absolutely sure it is the same case here and everywhere else.

Top US virologists have been stunned by revelations about the laxity of the US Covid testing regimen. It turns out that tests that deliver a simple binary “positive or negative” result are not fit for purpose, as they tell us nothing about the contagiousness of each person.

Data from three US states – New York, Nevada and Massachusetts – shows that when the amount of the virus found in a person is taken into account, up to 90 percent of people who have tested positive should actually have been negative, as they are carrying only tiny amounts of the virus, are not contagious, pose no risk to others, and have no need to isolate.

This means that only a fraction of the daily “cases” being reported so hysterically in the mainstream media are actual, bona fide Covid-19 sufferers, and need treatment and to separate themselves from others

This also means they have been exposed to the virus and are absolutely fine. It also means that large sections of the population have been exposed and we probably have herd immunity given the virus was in the country at least 10 weeks before the lockdown and must have spread to huge numbers of the population. [The flip side is we are to believe this contagious disease for which we are supposed social distance for, was somehow not spreading until the lockdown was announced.] All these tests are doing is confirming this but because the tests are so bad and the viral amounts so low in some people, those people show up positive.

At this rate the governments will be able to play this game indefinitely into the future and all the while using it as an excuse to bring in the New Abnormal and continue with their authoritarian rule.

So how could this have happened? The answer has to do with the sensitivity of PCR (Polymerase chain reaction) tests for Covid ....
-which the inventor of the PCR technique, Nobel Prize winner Kary Mullis warned PCR should never been used for medical testing in this way.....which it turns out can be ramped up according to the taste of the testing companies. Most testing companies have chosen the outrageously high sensitivity limit of 40 PCR cycles – meaning that the DNA in a sample is exponentially increased 40 times in order to amplify its signal.

But using such a ridiculously sensitive test means that the faintest traces of a dead virus, or even leftovers from previous infections, can result in a positive. Professor Juliet Morrison, a University of California virologist, said that even a limit of 35 PCR cycles is too high, let alone 40. She said she was “shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive.” But apparently, pretty much everyone in the US Covid brain trust took exactly that on faith.

So the scale of the pandemic ‘problem’ is actually much smaller than we’ve been led to believe – about a tenth of what all the politicians and media have been using to justify the lockdowns, the quarantines, the mass testing. Some may be shocked that the scale of the problem is so much smaller than assumed. But for a seasoned ignorer of any and all statistics that contain Covid ‘cases’, there are no surprises here. The truth is, there was never any reason to be confident in such figures. The FDA has only now been forced to concede that they have no idea how different testing companies determine which the positive and negative tests are: they just accept whatever data they are given.

What these findings bring is absolute assurance that the testing to this point has been an utter waste of time, and that not one statistic concerning this pandemic – from cases to deaths to infection rates – can be believed

The full report can be read here

Related Link: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/499816-positive-covid-virus-contagious/
© 2001-2021 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy