New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?114-115 Fri Jan 10, 2025 14:04 | en

offsite link End of Russian gas transit via Ukraine to the EU Fri Jan 10, 2025 13:45 | en

offsite link After Iraq, Libya, Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, the Pentagon attacks Yemen, by Thier... Tue Jan 07, 2025 06:58 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en

offsite link Pentagon could create a second Kurdish state Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:31 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Why American casualties in Iraq are so LOW

category international | anti-war / imperialism | opinion/analysis author Wednesday May 05, 2004 00:58author by David C. Report this post to the editors

The success of American 'casualty-management' techniques and propaganda have reduced the 'official' US casualty rate in Iraq from about 3,000 dead to about 750 dead.

Approximately 757 American military personal have been killed in Iraq since the U.S. invaded that country one year ago. This casualty count is interpreted by the American government and by the majority of the world's media as being unacceptably high, and a major media-management campaign has been implemented by the Americans to diminish its impact. Photographs of caskets and dead soldiers are banned, President Bush refuses to attend military funerals, and the U.S. military release the bare minimum of information about casualties.

These casualty figures are, however, artificially low. They are held low by a combination of factors, many of which are intentionally intended to minimize the effect of American casualties in public opinion in the U.S. These factors are outlined below:

THE PROPORTION OF WOUNDED WHO DIE HAS BEEN REDUCED. Improvements in body armour, field medical care and evacuation have collectively reduced the proportion of injured soldiers who are killed to about 1 in 6, which is much lower than the 1 in 3 ratio experienced in all previous American wars, including the first gulf war. This allows many extremely maimed people to be excluded from the casualty figures. Had the wounded-to-dead ratio remained at the historical level, the US would have experienced about 1,600 to 2,000 dead by this point. An inadvertent leak by a mid-level American military official in March revealed that there were 18,000 medical evacuations from Iraq at that point, illustrating the extent of injuries. Those numbers, and the 'official' number of wounded (about 4000) are undoubtedly far higher following April's uprising.

MANY OF THE DEAD ARE CONTRACTORS. Haliburton/KBR - a major military contractor working for US forces in Iraq, has lost about 40 of its people to deadly violence in Iraq. Titan Corp., another contractor, has lost about 20. Many dozens of other companies, including many non-US and non-western companies, have also lost personnel. There are no 'official' numbers available of contractors killed in Iraq, however it likely exceeds 200 and might even be has high as 400. These are casualties among those who perform military roles and which therefore should be counted as US military dead. They are, in fact, ignored.

MANY OF THE DEAD ARE FOREIGN TROOPS. The relatively tiny non-US portion of the so-called 'coalition' have been losing troops at a faster rate than the US military. About 107 of the 22,000 non-US coalition troops in Iraq have died, a proportion that is slightly higher than for US troops. But the deaths of Salvadorian or Ukrainian or even British troops rarely generate media interest in the US, and have almost no impact on US public opinion.

MANY OF THE DEAD ARE IRAQI. The US has rapidly handed over the most dangerous and challenging military roles to teams of under-trained, under-equipped Iraqi 'troops', who are attracted by salaries and by a genuine desire to help their homeland. A recent photograph in the New York times showed a joint US-Iraqi patrol, in which patrol dogs used by the Americans wore body armour while the Iraq forces wore none. This use of Iraqis approaches the 'human shield' policies of the Baathist regime and is used to minimize American casualties. You can imagine how much the American public cares about Iraqi dead. As many as 1200 Iraqis have died performing US military missions in Iraq.

American casualty management has therefore successfully reduced the 'official' number of American casualties from as many as 3,000 to about 750. This campaign, combined with an extensive ongoing media campaign against effectively reporting even the 'official' casualties', has been partially responsible for Americans disinterest in the truth about the reasons for the Iraq war, about the low level of support for the Americans within Iraq and internationally and about the lack of any realistic US plan for withdrawal. When US public opinion finally wakes up then the US will withdraw from Iraq. Unfortunately, American propaganda about casualties will delay that withdrawal, and will therefore contribute to the number of Americans and Iraqis who will die in the coming year.

 #   Title   Author   Date 
   Don't forget     kokomero    Wed May 05, 2004 14:22 
   US Citizen     RJT    Wed May 05, 2004 18:39 
   Truth is anti-American.     David C.    Wed May 05, 2004 19:57 
   Another reasons casualties are soooo low     righteous pragmatist    Wed May 05, 2004 21:12 
   Yeah those scumsucker iraqis...     David    Wed May 05, 2004 21:20 
   WHY Americans have lost Iraq....     David C.    Wed May 05, 2004 21:47 
   Are those the same Humvees     kokomero    Thu May 06, 2004 10:18 
   You don't care about Iraqi freedom and justice!     righteous pragmatist    Thu May 06, 2004 13:44 
   For the Nth time read your history books     kokomero    Thu May 06, 2004 16:53 
 10   One of the reasons there may be reported so few American casualties     pavilion type    Thu May 06, 2004 17:08 
 11   I was NOT complaining..     David C.    Thu May 06, 2004 19:14 
 12   US Casualities are always low     Terry    Fri May 07, 2004 00:50 
 13   How the Russians won the war: history 101 for dumb-ass Americans!     kokomero    Fri May 07, 2004 10:24 
 14   One American speaks out     Abigail Mernagh    Fri May 07, 2004 19:52 
 15   Re: One American speaks out     Terry    Fri May 07, 2004 20:24 
 16   Wait a minute here...     David C.    Fri May 07, 2004 20:36 
 17   Response To Mr Jerks comments     neutral    Sat May 29, 2004 18:18 
 18   Russian liberation?     A Russian-liberated East German    Mon May 31, 2004 20:32 
 19   You're some craic boy     Northern Eye    Mon May 31, 2004 22:05 
 20   VIETNAMIRAQVIETNAMIRAQ     hiedi    Tue Jun 01, 2004 01:08 
 21   The price of the illegal invasion!     Maroni    Tue Jun 01, 2004 01:28 
 22   It's all about OIL, nothing else!     Tom    Tue Jun 01, 2004 11:53 
 23   WWII wasn't just fought on the ground - or in Europe     Sean Healy    Tue Jun 01, 2004 14:32 
 24   David/ David C     s    Tue Jun 01, 2004 14:48 
 25   Cut the revisionism     kokomero    Tue Jun 01, 2004 17:55 
 26   Pathetic murders!     Tom Yum    Tue Jun 01, 2004 19:04 
 27   Pathetic murderers!     Tom Yum    Tue Jun 01, 2004 19:08 
 28   Hey, here the Cow Bys again     Tom Yum    Wed Jun 02, 2004 00:00 
 29   Another Americans Opinion     Just a plain American    Sat Jun 05, 2004 05:30 
 30   Get real     toneore    Tue Nov 16, 2004 23:41 
 31   "The war is a NON-ISSUE in American politics"     paddy    Wed Nov 17, 2004 00:38 


Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy