Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
The Case for Prosecuting Bob Vylan for Hate Speech Wed Jul 02, 2025 11:14 | Laura Perrins As defenders of free speech we resent Britain's draconian hate speech laws. But until they're repealed they should be applied impartially ? and that means prosecuting antisemitic rappers too, says Laura Perrins.
The post The Case for Prosecuting Bob Vylan for Hate Speech appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
BBC Complaints Director Takes Six-Month Sabbatical to Learn How to Promote ?Climate Crisis? Wed Jul 02, 2025 09:00 | Chris Morrison The BBC's Complaints Director, Colin Tregear, has taken a six-month sabbatical to learn how to promote the 'climate crisis' ? courtesy of the green grooming course run by the Oxford Climate Journalism Network.
The post BBC Complaints Director Takes Six-Month Sabbatical to Learn How to Promote ‘Climate Crisis’ appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Why is Skeptical Inquirer Never Sceptical About Climate Change? Wed Jul 02, 2025 07:00 | Steven Tucker US popular science magazine Skeptical Inquirer prides itself on putting science before dogma. Why then is it fully signed up to the regime consensus on Magical CO2 and its super-heating properties, asks Steven Tucker.
The post Why is Skeptical Inquirer Never Sceptical About Climate Change? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Wed Jul 02, 2025 01:09 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Sheer Bad Craziness of UK Immigration Law Tue Jul 01, 2025 19:30 | Dr David McGrogan A sensible country does not seek to 'manage' foreign sex offenders and drug traffickers 'in the community', says Dr David McGrogan. It ejects them. It's well past time UK law were changed to make this absolutely clear.
The post The Sheer Bad Craziness of UK Immigration Law appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Rossport 5 should not have to spend another day or night in jail
national |
environment |
press release
Thursday August 25, 2005 13:45 by elaine - labour

after 58 days in prison the Rossport 5 should not have to spend another day or night in jail and Shell should immediately take the initiative and go back to the Court and waive the Injunction. GILMORE CALLS ON SHELL TO LIFT INJUNCTION AGAINST ROSSPORT 5
Speaking at the Humbert Summer School in Ballina today, Labour Party Spokesperson on the Environment, Deputy Eamon Gilmore, called on the Shell Oil Company to collapse its injunction again the Rossport 5 and to allow the five men to be released from prison.
Deputy Gilmore said, “Today is the 58th day which the five men from Rossport will spend in prison. These normally law-abiding citizens have now spent more than two months in jail, in pursuit of a campaign to defend the health and safety of their families and communities. It is long past the time when they should be released.
“The responsibility for their continued imprisonment rests with Shell. These men were committed to prison for contempt of court arising from a civil injunction which was sought and obtained by Shell. In such civil injunction cases the prisoners can be released if either they themselves purge their contempt of court or if Shell waives the injunction.
”The reality is that over a two month period the five men have not gone back to Court to purge their contempt. Those who argue that it is up to themselves to do so and thereby secure their own release, fail to understand the dynamics which can be at work in a public controversy of this nature and the added difficulty of doing so after such a long period.
“Shell however could go back to Court and ask to have the Injunction lifted which would clear the way for the release of the men.
When the Labour Party Leader, Pat Rabbitte, put this proposal to Shell over a month ago, they argued that they could not do so as it would prejudice their options of seeking further Injunctions should protests continue. The legal advice available to the Labour Party is that this is not necessarily so and we pointed this out to Shell at the time.
“Now, over a month later, there is nothing to prevent Shell from waiving the injunction. The circumstances have significantly changed since the first day on which these five men were committed to prison. The imprisonment was on foot of the injunction which was sought and secured by Shell to restrain the men from obstructing or interfering with the entry by Shell onto lands for the purpose of preparation, construction and installation of the pipeline.
“Work on the construction of the pipeline has now stopped. The Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources has confirmed to the Dáil that Shell did not have the necessary permission for the construction of the pipeline in the first place, so the men are now in prison arising from a court injunction to stop them obstructing or interfering with the construction of a pipeline which was not itself legitimate from the very beginning.
“Shell’s apparent concern that, if released, the men would return and resume their protest is therefore groundless because the very work against which they were protesting has now been stopped.
“In any event. 58 days in prison is surely more than enough punishment for the men’s failure to comply with the terms of the court injunction. No matter what view is taken on the rights or wrongs of the Corrib Gas issue or the men’s protest or of the campaign associated with it, they should not have to spend another day or night in jail and Shell whose court injunction has caused them to be there, should act to secure their immediate release.
“Now that work on the pipeline has stopped and now that Shell has undertaken to engage in dialogue, the continued imprisonment of these five men serves absolutely no purpose.
“At a time when dangerous people are left free to commit crime against the innocent, because of insufficient evidence to convict them and when people who have committed serious crimes are being released from prison early, one has to wonder why on earth these five normally law abiding men have already served a prison sentence of over two months.
“Shell should immediately take the initiative and go back to the Court and waive the Injunction which they first sought and obtained and thereby clear the way for the men’s release.”
|
View Full Comment Text
save preference
Comments (103 of 103)