Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy
Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy
It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy
Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left
Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy Human Rights in Ireland >>
Is the Muslim Vote Abandoning Labour? Tue Jul 30, 2024 11:00 | Frank Haviland Is the 'Muslim vote' set to abandon Labour? With three quarters of British Muslims refusing to believe Hamas committed atrocities on October 7th, it's hard to see how Labour can retain them, says Frank Haviland.
The post Is the Muslim Vote Abandoning Labour? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Bridget Phillipson is Wrong About the Higher Education Freedom of Speech Act Tue Jul 30, 2024 09:00 | Dr Julius Grower Bridget Phillipson is wrong about the Higher Education Freedom of Speech Act she has just torpedoed, says Oxford law academic Dr Julius Grower. It won't increase legal action for universities but will ease it.
The post Bridget Phillipson is Wrong About the Higher Education Freedom of Speech Act appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
No, Ed Miliband Does Not Have a ?Mandate? for His Net Zero Lunacy Tue Jul 30, 2024 07:00 | Ben Pile With swivel-eyed zeal, Ed Miliband has been telling broadcasters he has a "mandate" to deliver his unworkable and unaffordable Net Zero agenda. Not when just 20% of the public voted for you, says Ben Pile.
The post No, Ed Miliband Does Not Have a ?Mandate? for His Net Zero Lunacy appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Tue Jul 30, 2024 00:49 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Huw Edwards Charged With Making Indecent Images of Children Mon Jul 29, 2024 19:00 | Will Jones Huw Edwards, one of the BBC's highest-paid stars who left the corporation last year, has been charged with three counts of making indecent images of children, the Metropolitan Police has said.
The post Huw Edwards Charged With Making Indecent Images of Children appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en
Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en
Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en
Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Cancer and a lost opportunity
international |
eu |
opinion/analysis
Wednesday November 23, 2005 17:38 by Kathy Sinnott
![Report this post to the editors Report this post to the editors](../graphics/report.gif)
With a close friend battling cancer and another friend going in for a biopsy next week, I am even more acutely aware of the breathtaking inadequacy of our cancer treatment services than usual. Prevention, where it is possible, is vital but the crisis in Irish cancer treatment makes me even more determined to promote anything that will help avoid the disease.
More than four years ago a decision was taken at EU level to deal with the chemical poisoning of people in European countries. Everyone who is aware of the enormity of the problem knew that chemicals must be classified according to degree of danger, then registered and controlled, and that this must be done urgently. So the EU decided to take a stand and curb our crazy, destructive romance with dangerous chemicals. The initative to get a handle on chemicals and establish safety standards on those that manufacture or import them or use them in production was named European Registration and Authorisation of Chemicals Directive, or REACH.
Selling REACH has been hard. Chemical companies and companies that use their products all predicted economic calamity if it was passed. And they wre right, the extra costs and restrictions of chemical usage could effect their competitiveness if only European companies were forced to comply. But this effect could have been neutralised if everything imported and sold in Europe was also required to comply with better chemical standards. This would have put the competition, at least in Europe, on an even playing field.
The initial intention of protecting health and environment seemed to get lost in the process as REACH went through multiple dilutions. After almost half a decade of research, debate, lobbying, and voting, REACH has morphed beyond recognition. As an MEP concerned about people's health and also concerned that families have jobs, I worked for a strong but workable REACH. Last week, after a two hour vote on amendments in the European Parliament, I could not in conscience vote for the tattered REACH that was left. For me two key elements were missling in the original document and were never really addressed. The document dealt with chemicals, metals and other substances in individual, isolated form. Which is OK if they are used in that form but this does not reflect the toxicity or safety of substances in combination, which is how chemicals are used in the vast majority of cases. REACH did not deal with this everyday phenomenon and was therefore rendered incapable of eliminating the now everyday phenomenon of serious, debilitating or even fatal illnesses like cancer.
The other problem is that REACH in the form it was finally presented to Euro MPs posed a real threat to business and this in the context of the EU militates against any real change. This was tragic because there was a way to have an effective chemical directive without threatening the economic survival of companies across Europe.
The final version of REACH was to no one's liking, according to the various EU group re-resentatives who spoke before the final vote. Though about 200 MEPs voted against REACH or abstained from voting for it, it was passed by the parliament. As far as I am concerned, everyone lost - most of all the citizens struggling with chemical overload. In the meantime let's keep fighting for better cancer treatment...as things are, we'll need it!
|
View Full Comment Text
save preference
Comments (1 of 1)