Upcoming Events

Limerick | Gender and Sexuality

no events match your query!

New Events

Limerick

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link UN human rights chief calls for priority action ahead of climate summit Sat Oct 30, 2021 17:18 | Human Rights

offsite link 5 Year Anniversary Of Kem Ley?s Death Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:34 | Human Rights

offsite link Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link DEI Wokery is Swallowing Small Businesses Too Fri Mar 29, 2024 09:00 | C.J. Strachan
It's not only large corporations with hyperactive HR departments that are succumbing to efficiency-sapping wokery, says C.J. Strachan. Small and medium-sized enterprises are being swallowed up by DEI as well.
The post DEI Wokery is Swallowing Small Businesses Too appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Are We Being Gaslit Over the Cause of the Princess of Wales?s Cancer? Fri Mar 29, 2024 07:00 | Melissa Kite
First Charles and then Kate ? it's hard to ignore the soaring cancer rate when two members of the Royal Family are diagnosed within weeks. But are we being gaslit about what's behind the surge, asks Melissa Kite.
The post Are We Being Gaslit Over the Cause of the Princess of Wales’s Cancer? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link News Round-Up Fri Mar 29, 2024 00:04 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the virus and the vaccines, the ?climate emergency? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Women?s Team with Five Male Players Wins Football Competition After One Male Player ?Broke Opponent?... Thu Mar 28, 2024 19:30 | Will Jones
A women?s football competition has been branded misogynist after it was won by a team featuring five transgender players, amid accusations one had broken an opponent?s leg in two places.
The post Women’s Team with Five Male Players Wins Football Competition After One Male Player “Broke Opponent’s Leg” ? But Teams Who Refuse to Play Against Them Are Branded “Discriminatory” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Further Evidence Gaza Casualty Numbers Are Fake Thu Mar 28, 2024 17:36 | Will Jones
The evidence that the Gaza casualty numbers from the Hamas-run Health Ministry (now over 32,000) are wildly inflated continues to mount. Mark Zlochin looks at what the proportions of male and female UNRWA workers tell us.
The post Further Evidence Gaza Casualty Numbers Are Fake appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Moscow attack reminds us of the links between Islamists and Kiev's fundamentalis... Tue Mar 26, 2024 06:57 | en

offsite link Failure to assist a people in danger of genocide, by Hassan Hamadé Tue Mar 26, 2024 06:32 | en

offsite link Yugoslavia March 24, 1999 The Founding War of the New Nato, by Manlio Dinucci Sun Mar 24, 2024 05:15 | en

offsite link France opposes Russian Korean-style peace project in Ukraine Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:11 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N°79 Fri Mar 22, 2024 11:40 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Limerick - Event Notice
Thursday January 01 1970

Pornography: A Violence Against Women

category limerick | gender and sexuality | event notice author Sunday September 10, 2006 01:15author by redjade Report this post to the editors

Pornography: A Violence Against Women, is a national conference hosted by The Limerick Rape Crisis Centre with the support of the Department of Justice Equality and Law Reform and The Health Service Executive.

Pornography: A Violence Against Women (October 23-24, Limerick)

On Monday & Tuesday 23rd & 24th October 2006.
Venue: Greenhills Hotel, Limerick


Pornography: A Violence Against Women, is a national conference hosted by The Limerick Rape Crisis Centre with the support of the Department of Justice Equality and Law Reform and The Health Service Executive.

This conference will explore the impact of pornography on our society. It will address the following questions: Have we become so desensitised to pornography that we ignore it's impact? Are we able to define what pornography means? Does the risk of male violence against women increase with society's growing tolerance of pornography? How can we channel our knowledge of the impact of pornography into direct action?

Among international speakers wioll be prof Diana Russell and Catherine Harper.

Conference Programme (pdf file)
http://www.activelink.ie/downl06/pornography-confprog06.pdf

Registration Form (pdf)
http://www.activelink.ie/downl06/pornography-regformg06.pdf

For further information please contact LRCC
Phone: 061-311511
E-mail: limerickrcc@oceanfree.net

author by Ron Jeremy's Step daughter Pet Monkey - Porn Before Profitpublication date Wed Sep 20, 2006 19:23author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Its sounds like you've already decided that pornography has a negative effect on society but on what basis, surely the sexual repression that caused something as mild as playboy to be banned up to the mid nineties in this country and the crusade against contraception is more damaging to society. If we see sex as dirty, then porn will be negative, if we see it to be the essential, natural thing it is and sometimes quite beautiful expression of humanity it can be, then we wont develope to require an industry which produces something which while desired will be damaging.

What about gay porn or female dominance porn are these also damaging society, also if porn has such a effect on abuse of women, why is spousal abuse of men on the rise.

author by ????publication date Wed Sep 20, 2006 19:46author address author phone Report this post to the editors

What about female porn, directed by women for women, such as is on sale in Ann summer's shop on O'Connell street. How about Ann Summer's shop itself is this encouraging male violence against women. This is merely sexual repression dressed up as protection. How about priests who abused kids in institutions, was this because of porn? The whole structure of your post gives the impression that you have come to your conclusions and are now trying to give an aura of academia to back up your studies. I suggest you invite Betty Dodson to your conference and see what she has to say about this.

author by Chris Murray - .publication date Wed Sep 20, 2006 20:00author address author phone Report this post to the editors

A perusal of the groups involved would however point to a specific slant:
LRCC, the HSE and The Dept of Justice, Equality and Law reform.

Maybe it should begin therefore with the definition of Pornography, assuming it
to be directed toward the mass consumer/exploitation/violent end of the market
Not of course forgetting that the party of commodification is led by the Tanaiste
and Minister for Justice who has not reviewed the pornography Laws (something
we can all be greatful for, no doubt)

Pornography is consumed and produced by women, also. Never mind putting
pretty labels like 'erotica'on it, thus defining it would most definitely be a grey area.
Two of the contributors to the evening are Statutory bodies, thus I would just
listen to the LRCC, who are,working at the coal face in terms of legislations and protections
for victims of rape and sexual abuse. A perusal of DRCC/LRCC figures makes salutory
reading in relation to convictions and custodial sentences for the crime of rape.

Related Link: http://www.drcc.ie
author by sammy Leepublication date Wed Oct 04, 2006 14:38author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Anything that gets important issues up for discussion is a good idea. So I don't think the negative comments are really justified. The important thing is that it is an open frank and un biased debate. The starting point must be a clear and unambiguous definition as to what pornography really is. It has been my experience that there are a whole myriad of opinions on this topic alone. I think once that is established (No easy matter) and it is know what the discussion is really about then some kind of conclusions could be reached.

author by Chris Murraypublication date Wed Oct 04, 2006 16:18author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Thats a whole other thread......

author by redjadepublication date Wed Oct 04, 2006 16:42author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced . . . [b]ut I know it when I see it . . . "
- US Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, 1964

http://library.findlaw.com/2003/May/15/132747.html

——————

Museum Field Trip Deemed Too Revealing
October 2, 2006
by the New York Times

''....Ms. McGee, 51, a popular art teacher with 28 years in the classroom, is out of a job after leading her fifth-grade classes last April through the Dallas Museum of Art. One of her students saw nude art in the museum, and after the child’s parent complained, the teacher was suspended.

Although the tour had been approved by the principal, and the 89 students were accompanied by 4 other teachers, at least 12 parents and a museum docent, Ms. McGee said, she was called to the principal the next day and “bashed.”

She later received a memorandum in which the principal, Nancy Lawson, wrote: “During a study trip that you planned for fifth graders, students were exposed to nude statues and other nude art representations.” It cited additional complaints, which Ms. McGee has challenged.

The school board suspended her with pay on Sept. 22.

[....]

Retracing her route this week through the museum’s European and contemporary galleries, Ms. McGee passed the marble torso of a Greek youth from a funerary relief, circa 330 B.C.; its label reads, “his nude body has the radiant purity of an athlete in his prime.” She passed sculptor Auguste Rodin’s tormented “Shade;” Aristide Maillol’s “Flora,” with her clingy sheer garment; and Jean Arp’s “Star in a Dream.”''

More at
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/1002-07.htm

Ms. McGee
Ms. McGee

Aristide Maillol's 'Flora'
Aristide Maillol's 'Flora'

author by Chris Murray - jesuspublication date Wed Oct 04, 2006 17:32author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I have two kids both of whom were brought to museums and art galleries in their prams-
the boredom of the mundanity of the nappies etc-ya know.

and yes they saw nudes, rudes, bits and pieces.

one of them is at an awkward age and shields his eyes "in case they get soiled"
when he goes to galleries now- has the world gone completetly mad.

But there is no use in provoking a discussion on Art Vs Porn, in the mentality of the
weird prudery of globalised monoculture, because it pre-suppouses that there is
a difference betwixt the two- depending on choice/education and personal pecadiiloes
there is art in some classes of porn- be it imagistic/written/photographic.

its the non-sensical ring-fencing of the issue into a level of debate that that has
something to do with what people would understand as 'pornographic' and that is
a lucky dip situation depending on perception.

the assumption, as stated before is that the organisers of the above talk are
specifically referring to commodified and exploitative pornography, but really
it should say so.

author by A Cigarpublication date Thu Oct 05, 2006 08:30author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Portrait of the artist as a dirty old man
A new study of Norman Rockwell finds sexual innuendo
lurking amid his classic images of innocence

Norman Rockwell's famous 1954 painting, ``Girl at Mirror," portrays a girl in the midst of one of life's great transitions. The near-adolescent sits on a stool in a white nightgown, chin in hands, pondering her appearance. A magazine on her lap is opened to a glamour shot of Jane Russell.

The viewer can fill in her thoughts: When will I be a woman? Am I pretty enough? When can I wear lipstick like Jane Russell? (A tube sits beside her stool.)

Richard Halpern, an English professor at Johns Hopkins University and author of the new book ``Norman Rockwell: The Underside of Innocence," adds another question: What's with that creepy doll on the floor? ``There is something slightly indecent about its posture," he writes, noting the raised rump. The doll, he suggests in language too colorful to repeat here, appears to be engaged in a quasi-sexual act with the mirror frame.

And it's no accident, as Halpern interprets it. Adolescence isn't all sweetness and light, of course, and the doll signals Rockwell's awareness of its more carnal side. The doll, he writes, ``grotesquely amplifies...the delicate point of sexual transition at which the girl finds herself."

....

Consider ``Cave of the Winds (Girl with Skirt Blowing Up)," a Saturday Evening Post cover from 1920. With a grinning boy behind her, a girl at an amusement park is captured in the moment when jets on the floor fire air up into her skirt. The picture's true subject, Halpern says, is not childhood fun but ``the shock of sexual difference." The girl has closed her knees and predictably grabbed her skirt, yet her hand finds itself in a suggestive location, Halpern notes. Her face is ``flustered" with alarm, but also, perhaps, pleasure.

But Freud is really in the details. An empty peanut bag floats at knee level, its opening pointed at the viewer. Halpern says that motif is repeated meaningfully: ``The Cave, the bag, the balloon, the billowing skirts, the girl's pursed but open lips-all are externalized emblems of the empty...cavelike thing we are not allowed to see but see nevertheless."

Don't blame the critic, Halpern says: It's the painting, not his reading, that's ``heavy handedly Freudian."

Article in Boston Globe
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2006/10...=full

====/
Girl at Mirror
1954
The Saturday Evening Post, March 6, 1954 (cover)
http://artchive.com/artchive/R/rockwell/rockwell_mirror....html
Link to image:
http://www.artchive.com/artchive/r/rockwell/rockwell_mi...r.jpg

Norman Rockwell's "Cave of the Winds" on the cover of the Saturday Evening Post in 1920.
Norman Rockwell's "Cave of the Winds" on the cover of the Saturday Evening Post in 1920.

author by Miriam Cottonpublication date Thu Oct 05, 2006 11:01author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Violence against women is the ultimate expression of sexism and sexist attitudes. It's not necessarily physical either. Men have cultivated deep-seated strategies for making women feel intimidated: contempt, silence, aggrssive communication, dismissiveness, indifference and irritability. In communication, women are commonly perceived by men to have been speaking for three times longer than they were. They are talked across and silenced with hand and other gestures - often with a smile - but silenced nevertheless. Womens views and observations are not taken as seriously and they are frequently simply ignored. If a woman dares to challenge these attitudes she will find herself objectified as devious and unpleasant. If she dares to show impatience or frustration her anger and assertiveness will be defined as the subject of the discussion while the thing she is actually saying will continue to be ignored - often wilfully. These outcomes have been documented about a million times in a million different ways. It is no use for men who may not have lapsed into outright violence against women to think they are somehow superior to those who have. Most men - certainly in this country - have yet to trouble with understanding deep-seated sexism and how it creates the breeding ground which cultivates violence and psychological and social misery for women. Spare us please the men who are anxious to claim their anti-sexist credentials without respecting the views of women themselves - who think that they can determine what it is like and how it ought to be for women. Violence and prnography are at the extreme end of a long spectrum of deeply sexist attitudes and unless or until that fact is acknowledged by men, rape, physical and other forms of abuse will continue to be a serious problem. The only way that the situation is going to change is when men finally recognise that they cant tell us what its like - its us who must teach them - they must properly respect us. Their perspective must not be the norm from inside which our norm is considered. Most men havent the foggiest idea what they are talking about when it comes to this stuff and it is Irish women who continue to pay a heavy price for that.

author by robpublication date Thu Oct 05, 2006 14:47author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Spare us please the women who are anxious to claim their anti-sexist credentials without respecting the views of men themselves - who think that they can determine what it is like and how it ought to be for men.

author by HBpublication date Thu Oct 05, 2006 15:25author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Rape (next to femicide) is the most extreme act that can be perpretrated on women by men. So I hesitate before pushing my (male) nose into this discussion. But I just want to point out that not all women are as supportive of other women as they should be. For example there are a considerable number of women who are so politically conservative that they are opposed to women (including women who have suffered rape) having the right to choose whether they can have a termination of the resulting pregnancy.

Also on the subject of rape, I came across the following BBC report:

Mexico police 'hushed up rapes'

"Mexico's police covered up the rape and abuse of demonstrators at a land rights protest in May, Amnesty International has said.
Prosecutors destroyed witness statements and prison doctors refused to verify claims of abuse, according to testimony taken by the rights group."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5407092.stm
http://chicago.indymedia.org/newswire/display/74228/ind...x.php

author by Chris Murraypublication date Thu Oct 05, 2006 15:38author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Don't be hesitant about pushing your male nose in, there is nothing wrong in
advocating women's rights if you are a guy- it's called anti-patriarchy.

The constructs, societal and within the establishment that repress women and
stick us into little boxes also do the same to men.

The point is to keep getting the info out there, so that the issue of
rape/exploitative porn is not just a black hole- that no-one discusses.

The problem with the political structures (example-Ireland) in relation to
the sex laws, pornography or abortion is that they lack women's voices
so we are in a situation wherein the female body is legislated for by a male
dominated legislature and it is used as a moral battle-ground in many
countries, including at the minute Poland, where the right-wing are attempting
to amend the constittion to reduce abortion rights.

The issue is Covered in the Guardian today (editorial section).

Lack of women's voices in established power structures are creating situations
of alienation and the phenomomen is world-wide, there are radical feminist groups
branching out globally in oppostion to the political usage of women's bodies
to advance right-wing control agendas-including reproductive rights.

Related Link: http://www.federa.org.pl/signatures/
author by redjadepublication date Thu Oct 05, 2006 23:08author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I recieved an email the other day from a friend asking if I wrote this piece (the post at the top of this thread).

No, I did not. It is an excerpt from the Calendar section of ActiveLink.ie

I should have added this link with the post - apologies for not doing so:
http://www.activelink.ie/ce/active.php?id=3934

I posted the info of the event (on September 10th) to help get the 'Gender and Sexuality' category going and encourage it be used by people.

It is sadly worth noting that since this category was started a few months ago - and only after a bit controversy and much debate! - it is rarely used.

By posting events by The Limerick Rape Crisis Centre and other orgs, I hope that activists will go to these events and report on them on Indymedia.ie.

author by Ninjamanpublication date Wed Oct 25, 2006 19:02author address author phone Report this post to the editors

To call her a fundamentalist would be a compliment. She (an academic) showed herself to be nothing more than mentally ill.

Porn is responsible for everything is seems.

I wonder what caused violence against women before porn?
What about mormon?
Sweden?

author by Spinpublication date Wed Oct 25, 2006 19:13author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Spin 103.8 is owned and driven by Denis O Brien. as is Newstalk 106.

Any slant it gives to anything would necessarily be on the Patriarchial side or
designed to make and eejit of any woman who was stupid enough to go ond
take the O Brien Penny. He works with PJ mara , you Know (ex haughey PR).

There cannot be a reasonable discussion with women on issues like these
as long as they are painted black and white by the media. This 'event'
is co-hosted by the dept of Justice and the HSE- neither known for their
approach to equality-except on paper and producing reports.

They say that rape is a crime- they have the lowest conviction figures in the developed world,
they deport women victims of FGM to Nigeria. Their employment policy is
male-orientated. The HSE is so politicised that it has become non-functional,
it is implicated in land -purchases deals that stink and it is dominated by
the political agenda of the present administration.

A reasoned discussion on sexual violence is out the window as long as these
media/establishment figures dominate the agenda. The only worthwhile
speakers in the above article are LRCC. and the figures are not pretty.

Related Link: http://www.drcc.ie
Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy