North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
Anti-Empire >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Fraud and mismanagement at University College Cork Thu Aug 28, 2025 18:30 | Calli Morganite
UCC has paid huge sums to a criminal professor
This story is not for republication. I bear responsibility for the things I write. I have read the guidelines and understand that I must not write anything untrue, and I won't.
This is a public interest story about a complete failure of governance and management at UCC.
Deliberate Design Flaw In ChatGPT-5 Sun Aug 17, 2025 08:04 | Mind Agent
Socratic Dialog Between ChatGPT-5 and Mind Agent Reveals Fatal and Deliberate 'Design by Construction' Flaw
This design flaw in ChatGPT-5's default epistemic mode subverts what the much touted ChatGPT-5 can do... so long as the flaw is not tickled, any usage should be fine---The epistemological question is: how would anyone in the public, includes you reading this (since no one is all knowing), in an unfamiliar domain know whether or not the flaw has been tickled when seeking information or understanding of a domain without prior knowledge of that domain???!
This analysis is a pretty unique and significant contribution to the space of empirical evaluation of LLMs that exist in AI public world... at least thus far, as far as I am aware! For what it's worth--as if anyone in the ChatGPT universe cares as they pile up on using the "PhD level scholar in your pocket".
According to GPT-5, and according to my tests, this flaw exists in all LLMs... What is revealing is the deduction GPT-5 made: Why ?design choice? starts looking like ?deliberate flaw?.
People are paying $200 a month to not just ChatGPT, but all major LLMs have similar Pro pricing! I bet they, like the normal user of free ChatGPT, stay in LLM's default mode where the flaw manifests itself. As it did in this evaluation.
AI Reach: Gemini Reasoning Question of God Sat Aug 02, 2025 20:00 | Mind Agent
Evaluating Semantic Reasoning Capability of AI Chatbot on Ontologically Deep Abstract (bias neutral) Thought
I have been evaluating AI Chatbot agents for their epistemic limits over the past two months, and have tested all major AI Agents, ChatGPT, Grok, Claude, Perplexity, and DeepSeek, for their epistemic limits and their negative impact as information gate-keepers.... Today I decided to test for how AI could be the boon for humanity in other positive areas, such as in completely abstract realms, such as metaphysical thought. Meaning, I wanted to test the LLMs for Positives beyond what most researchers benchmark these for, or have expressed in the approx. 2500 Turing tests in Humanity?s Last Exam.. And I chose as my first candidate, Google DeepMind's Gemini as I had not evaluated it before on anything.
Israeli Human Rights Group B'Tselem finally Admits It is Genocide releasing Our Genocide report Fri Aug 01, 2025 23:54 | 1 of indy
We have all known it for over 2 years that it is a genocide in Gaza
Israeli human rights group B'Tselem has finally admitted what everyone else outside Israel has known for two years is that the Israeli state is carrying out a genocide in Gaza
Western governments like the USA are complicit in it as they have been supplying the huge bombs and missiles used by Israel and dropped on innocent civilians in Gaza. One phone call from the USA regime could have ended it at any point. However many other countries are complicity with their tacit approval and neighboring Arab countries have been pretty spinless too in their support
With the release of this report titled: Our Genocide -there is a good chance this will make it okay for more people within Israel itself to speak out and do something about it despite the fact that many there are actually in support of the Gaza
China?s CITY WIDE CASH SEIZURES Begin ? ATMs Frozen, Digital Yuan FORCED Overnight Wed Jul 30, 2025 21:40 | 1 of indy
This story is unverified but it is very instructive of what will happen when cash is removed
THIS STORY IS UNVERIFIED BUT PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO OR READ THE TRANSCRIPT AS IT GIVES AN VERY GOOD IDEA OF WHAT A CASHLESS SOCIETY WILL LOOK LIKE. And it ain't pretty
A single video report has come out of China claiming China's biggest cities are now cashless, not by choice, but by force. The report goes on to claim ATMs have gone dark, vaults are being emptied. And overnight (July 20 into 21), the digital yuan is the only currency allowed.
The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)
Jump To Comment: 4 3 2 1The documents on Tara appeared on the Dept of the Environment website but they were circulating among party members before that apparently.
Here are the links to the documents on the website:
http://www.environ.ie/en/Heritage/Archaeology-NationalM...n.htm
and
http://www.environ.ie/en/Heritage/Archaeology-NationalM...n.htm
This is the latest video link as well:
http://www.livevideo.com/video/1C1710A516DD43F2BE33544D...23677
and check out the latest blogspot
http://www.everydayispaddysday.blogspot.com/
...to help this revolting medicine go down!
For Minister Gormley to have done anything worthwhile in relation to Tara I'm afraid he would've really needed to want to.
Pre-election promises on such emotive subjects as this and the Poolbeg Incinerator ensured that they would stand a chance at achieving some degree of power. Nobody believed for a second that they would sell their souls to the Devil (well his right hand man) as well as all the REAL green supporters in Ireland in order to be affiliated with FF. Anybody wonder why Patricia McKenna was in tears just prior to the announcement that they were joining FF. What is it - an extra 90K+ p.a. for a Ministerial post - or so Mary Harney said during an interview?
I'm Green and proud of it. Unfortunately the Green Party I voted for has decided that Green is the New Yellow and seems to have lost their Green values - Shame on you.
The saying goes, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me". It will never be 'shame on me' as I will never be voting for the current Green Party again and probably not any other alleged Green Party. Green candidates will be lucky to retain local county posts in the future let alone government.
How does it feel Minister Gormley to be at the behest of a man (BERTIE) that before this election repulsed you by his disregard of the Irish people and their country? How do you sleep at night? Are you finding people whom you referred to as friends have distanced themselves from you? No Minister, I don't expect answers to any of my questions because, no matter how important the questions are, the silence from the Green Party has been DEAFENING.
Another sickeningly sad day in Ireland!
Was there a covering letter providing a context for this circular ? In what manner was it introduced?
there were 2 documents circulated. here's the second one
REPORT TO MINISTER (NO.1)
LISMULLIN ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
The Committee has met on two occasions so far. The main outcomes of these meetings were as follows.
At the first meeting held on 27 June last the following issues were discussed:
>The Committee’s Terms of Reference
>How the Committee will operate;
>Options and techniques for surveying the site of the monument and the surrounding area.
>Works required in preparation for a geophysical survey;
>Potential risks to the site.
During the course of these discussions the following were agreed;
a)That an on-site inspection by the Committee should be conducted as soon as possible (this was set for 10 July);
b)Weather permitting, that the existing protective covers should be removed and that more suitable alternative covering be considered;
c)That part of the monument outside the road land-take will be investigated to the extent possible; the adjoining landowner has no objection to the surveying of his land;
d)That a geophysical “chariot” would be too heavy for such a delicate site and that the geo-physical survey will be conducted by hand;
e) Aerial photographic coverage of the site (both vertical and oblique) would be taken to provide the basis for a detailed topographical survey.
During the course of the meeting the Committee was also briefed on and discussed the proposed release of documents relating to the Ministerial Directions for Lismullin; the Minister’s indication of his intention to consult widely on future archaeological policy and practice; the need for strong policies to avoid secondary development, particularly in the vicinity of the Blundelstown Interchange; the possibility of developing a Management Plan for Tara along the lines of the Boyne Valley Management Plan; the potential for the Minister to influence decisions on proposed developments in his role as prescribed body under planning legislation.
The Committee agreed that recommendations relating to the protection and management of the landscape in the Tara area as a whole should be included in recommendations to be put forward by the Committee.
At the second meeting held on Tuesday, 10 July the discussion focussed on site conditions, future works and the timeframe for carrying out these works.
Site Condition:
It was agreed by the Committee that the site was in a very vulnerable condition, could not sustain or withstand preservation in situ and that, therefore, excavation is desirable and in the best interests of the archaeological remains. The archaeological remains are suffering, particularly from rain water ingress and though this will be ameliorated with the introduction of a new plastic cover (see below), once the site has dried out sufficiently excavation should proceed. ;
It was agreed that the existing covers on the monument would be lifted on Wednesday 11th July; 5 –6 larger, lighter and more suitable covers have been sourced and these will be put in place over the next few days to minimise unnecessary traffic across the site;
All metal grid pegs etc will be replaced with bamboos as the plastic cover is being removed;
Heavy rain has led to considerable silt deposits which create an extra layer of cover over parts of the surface of the monument; as part of the excavation strategy these deposits will have to be carefully removed without eroding or damaging the under-lying archaeological features;
Weather conditions will be the key driver in determining both the time-scale and the measures to be put in place to excavate the site
Future Works/Timeframe:
The geophysical survey will take place in phases – outside the landtake, inside the land-take but outside the area of the national monument and within the monument site itself (this latter pending approval from the Advisory Group (see below));
In the event that weather remains unfavourable then consideration will be given to the alternative of undertaking geophysical survey and excavation contemporaneously;
The first phase of the survey by a geo-physical company from the UK will commence on Wednesday 11 July;
The results of the phase one survey will inform the basis on which further phases are to be carried out. This will include an assessment of the value of carrying out geophysical survey on the current surface of the monument within the roadtake and a report in this regard is due by Friday, 13 July;
Aerial photography will take place but this is weather dependent
Geochemical analysis of the site will take place as the site is being excavated or beforehand if possible.
Subject to the initial geophysical survey report on 13 July and a recommendation that the geophysical survey over the area of the monument within the road take would have a value , the Committee will be asked by phone or e-mail to approve the geophysical survey of the enclosure over the weekend (14th and 15th of July); it has since been established that because of the weather conditions a geo-physical survey over this weekend would not be possible.
A revised, dedicated archaeological methodology statement will be prepared considering the exact nature and configuration of the known remains, the possibility of multi-periodicity and what may be anticipated based on excavation and survey of similar monuments elsewhere.
The Committee will meet again on 18th July to advise, subject to Ministerial approval on the detailed proposals for the excavation of the monument site, to commence, weather permitting, on 23rd July. This aspect of the work is expected to take around 12 weeks to complete.
In overall terms the Committee has agreed:
That the excavation of the site within the area of the road-take and the preservation in situ of the portion outside the road was the best archaeological practice.
That, given the vulnerable nature of the site, and the imminent threats to its degradation by natural elements that the excavation should proceed as soon as practicable.
A further, more detailed report will be prepared when the initial results from the first geophysical survey are known and the conditions on the ground improve sufficiently to allow the other proposed works to proceed.
The NRA will prepare a revised Method Statement reflecting the discussion on the excavation strategy for the site and the recommendations from the Committee in that regard;
That the Minister will be provided with further reports as necessary at significant stages of the excavation programme;
Related issues raised at this meeting were:
Possible engineering solutions for boundary treatment of the motorway in the vicinity of the monument;
Future of that part of the site outside the motorway land-take;
The related issue of lessening the visual impact of the motorway in the Tara/Skryne valley;
Re-examination of the current methodology of machine soil stripping ahead of archaeological excavation;
The longer term lessons to be learnt in this particular case in terms of in informing the Minister’s proposed overall review of archaeological policy and practice, with specific reference to the issue of defining and protecting archaeological/historic landscapes.
The NRA undertook to provide an engineering input on methods of dealing with the motorway boundary in the vicinity of the monument and can arrange for an engineer to attend a meeting of the Committee at an appropriate juncture;
The Minister’s decision to release the documents relating to the Directions given for Lismullin was also welcomed by the members of the Committee.
The Committee was also advised that certain legal issues have been raised by the EU and must be responded to by the Department.
Advisory Committee on Lismullin, National Monument,
13 July 2007.