Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
News Round-Up Wed Jan 08, 2025 01:28 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Elon Musk Wants to Buy Liverpool FC, His Father Reveals Tue Jan 07, 2025 19:30 | Will Jones Elon Musk's father has confirmed that the billionaire Tesla owner has expressed an interest in buying?Premier League?team?Liverpool.
The post Elon Musk Wants to Buy Liverpool FC, His Father Reveals appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Is Squid Game the Next Victim of Go Woke, Go Broke? Tue Jan 07, 2025 17:34 | Jack Watson What happened to Squid Game? The Korean show broke records in 2021. But the new season spends tedious scenes exploring a trans character's background. It's the latest victim of go woke, go broke, says Jack Watson.
The post Is Squid Game the Next Victim of Go Woke, Go Broke? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Facebook Dumps ?Politically Biased? Fact-Checkers That Have ?Destroyed More Trust Than They?ve Creat... Tue Jan 07, 2025 15:20 | Will Jones Facebook is to scrap its fact-checkers after Mark Zuckerberg said they have "been too politically biased and destroyed more trust than they've created" as he pledged to "restore free expression" on the social network.
The post Facebook Dumps “Politically Biased” Fact-Checkers That Have “Destroyed More Trust Than They’ve Created” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Why Won?t the Jo Cox Foundation Defend Rosie Duffield? Tue Jan 07, 2025 13:11 | David Ward The Jo Cox Foundation has come to the defence of Jess Phillips over the Elon Musk furore. But why was the foundation silent when Labour MP Rosie Duffield received death threats? Could it be her gender critical views?
The post Why Won’t the Jo Cox Foundation Defend Rosie Duffield? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
After Iraq, Libya, Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, the Pentagon attacks Yemen, by Thier... Tue Jan 07, 2025 06:58 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en
Pentagon could create a second Kurdish state Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:31 | en
Resolution condemning the glorification of Nazism Tue Dec 17, 2024 11:08 | en
How Washington and Ankara Changed the Regime in Damascus , by Thierry Meyssan Tue Dec 17, 2024 06:58 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Interenationalization of the Basque conflict and the European Arrest Warrant
international |
rights, freedoms and repression |
opinion/analysis
Thursday December 13, 2007 17:17 by Joseba Agudo and Edurne Iriondo, law - Basque Observatory of Human Rights info at behatokia dot info
INTERNATIONALIZATION OF THE BASQUE CONFLICT
AND THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT. Internationalizing the conflict
In the early 90s, the Spanish government decided to internationalize the political conflict between the Spanish State and the Basque Country, in terms of repression. Aided by an international context where, following the collapse of the Eastern Bloc, there was going to be a backlash regarding human rights throughout the world, the arrests of Basques began in various countries such as Mexico (1990), Uruguay (1992), Nicaragua (1993), etc. This internationalization of repression reached its high point during the second term in government of the conservative PP (2000-2004). At the time, the infamous “Agreement for Liberties and Against Terrorism” (a pact which has turned out to be a failure, as did all the previous agreements of this kind; i.e. aimed at the same unattainable objective: to terminate the struggle for independence in our country) stated that the international dimension was one of the basic pillars of the struggle against the independence movement.
It is interesting to see how during the last three years, when much progress has been made in terms of clarifying the key issues for conflict resolution, the PP has constantly protested against this progress, accusing the PSOE of furthering the aims of the Basque Left-wing Independence Movement by making certain moves in the international arena (the European Parliament resolution, among other examples). It is interesting because it was the PP itself who did the most to internationalize the conflict, both in Europe and in the American continent. They achieved this by pushing for all kinds of new repressive measures in the EU, demanding statements condemning armed actions by ETA at every international meeting and event, persecuting Basque exiles throughout the world by every means available, etc.
If there has been a political actor that has really helped to make the Basque struggle known around the world (which is also an aim of the Basque Independence Movement, with a view to raise support for a true and definitive conflict resolution process) it has undoubtedly been the Spanish Popular Party – with the support, as usual, of the PSOE.
Repression as an element of internationalization
It is clear that repression against Basques has been extended to many countries over recent years. It has also expanded to affect people who were often living lives with nothing to do with politics, because there was a 25 year-old charge against them, or simply because there was a need –there still is- for a photograph of repression bearing fruit outside the Spanish borders. Indeed, every time a Basque is extradited to Spain from another country, there is a photograph of that person being led off the plane by the police in every newspaper, just to prove that there is no safe haven for Basque exiles anywhere in the world.
Clearly, this repression has caused much damage to many Basque people and families. They have seen their lives being shattered by the cruel revenge of State repression against dissidence. Nevertheless, the force of this repression has often rebounded against the State. This was especially the case when Basque exiles imprisoned in countries around the world have won their cases and regained their freedom (4 cases in Mexico, the cases in Uruguay, Argentina, Belgium, Portugal and even in France), or when, in hard fought court cases, the alleged Spanish democracy has been shown in a true light (verdicts in which, despite granting extradition, the Spanish judicial system is severely criticized, in Germany, the Netherlands…).
This is why, over recent years, Bilateral Extradition Agreements have been established with most countries in America, and why, even within the European Union, they have managed to change the former extradition procedure to the European handover procedure, or European Arrest Warrant.
The European Arrest Warrant
As has been insistently pointed out, the European Arrest Warrant puts extreme limits to a detainee’s right to a defence. Despite the fact that it has been possible to slow down the process of handing over Basques to the Spanish State from Belgium and France, the truth is that the European Arrest Warrant has brought a fundamental change to international arrests by placing the responsibility (the obligation, almost) to hand over the detainee on the country where the arrest takes place, due to a mistaken concept of cooperation or reciprocity between states.
In any case, if the defence counsel’s right to use all the legal instruments in its power is upheld at these European Arrest Warrant trials, repression can become a boomerang against the Spanish State. We have recently seen an instance of this at Westminster Magistrate’s Court, where, throughout the sessions, rather than analysing the defendants’ actions, the lack of democracy in the Spanish State and in its appalling judiciary has been brought to light. At the end of the day, even if the initial decision was to hand over the detainees, the verdict is a good example of the juggling efforts foreign courts have to carry out in order to grant the warrant.
Unfortunately, there are many cases when the Spanish courts invent, lie about or reinterpret actions by Basque citizens, all in order to fit their activities within what they define as terrorism (which, incidentally, is defined one way today and tomorrow may turn out to have a broader definition –see the verdict against he Basque youth organization SEGI, etc.). In the case of the Sheffield Three, the European Arrest Warrant is simply a scandal, and the lack of legal bases so obvious that the prosecutor in charge of defending the interests of the State has had no other option but to resort to the argument that there should be a measure of trust towards the human rights situation in another EU country.
Every time a Basque is arrested outside our country (apart from the arrests that take place in the two occupying countries –France and Spain) this becomes a source of internationalization of the conflict. The lack of democracy in the Spanish State, its ludicrous legal and judicial system, all come into the picture. The cases become a mirror in which the monster of repression is seen by Europe and the world in its true shape. Furthermore, the fundamental issue of the denial of our People’s democratic right to discuss and decide is clearly seen, as well as the use of brute force to deny the Basque Country its freedom.
This antidemocratic Spanish system can no longer fool anyone, and the entire battery of repression deployed on the international level (whatever the new-fangled instruments they decorate it with) is more often than not a boomerang that turns back against the monster.
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (2 of 2)
Jump To Comment: 1 2from the European court of Human rights website :
..."The Court has declared partly admissible the applications Batasuna and Herri Batasuna v. Spain (Decision available only in French), Etxeberria and Others v. Spain (Decision available only in French) and Herritarren Zerrenda v. Spain (Decision available only in French). The Court’s admissibility decisions in no way prejudge the examination of the cases on the merits. "
links (french as they say)
http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=html&...98649
http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=html&...98649
http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=html&...98649
There all very quiet these days. Now that's not just cause mostly they're all in prison - for before they showed themselves well capable of doing their best attention seeking & agenda setting whilst in prison. But basically Otegi is reported as spending his time studying English & practising Yoga in his jail where he has till late 2008 to serve whilst Iñaki de Juana Chaos is doing weights "strong as a bull" and back up to 80 kilograms. His impecable behaviour is being remarked on. Why? Simple. With good behaviour he could be released in late February 2008. Yep. the month before the spanish state election.
Meanwhile the law suit against a mayor for refusing to fly the spanish flag on a Basque independence majority city council building has been archived.
& ZP and Sarko announced a new permanent body of investigation on both sides of the border which will see both spanish & french state agents get the privilege to bear their arms in other sovreign territory.
Oh yep.
all very quiet.
mendiz mendi menderik mendi
from 1 mountain to another.
In the Spanish state the repression does not stop, arrested hundreds of people in this year, now Strasbourg speaks on ilegalizacion and in Spain already they walk pressing so that it does not leave to ahead.
Freedom for the Basque Country!!!!
Eire Saor!!!!
Dhá Chine aon Croimhlint
Bi herri borroka bat
.