North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty Anti-Empire >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
News Round-Up Mon Jan 06, 2025 01:14 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Musk Says Farage ?Doesn?t Have What It Takes? to Lead Reform Sun Jan 05, 2025 18:00 | Richard Eldred In a twist that left the nation on the edge of its seat, Elon Musk has sensationally called for Nigel Farage to be removed as leader of Reform UK.
The post Musk Says Farage ?Doesn?t Have What It Takes? to Lead Reform appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Why Is Labour Focusing on Saving the Planet When Birkenhead Is Rapidly Becoming a Third World Slum? Sun Jan 05, 2025 16:00 | Dr David McGrogan Birkenhead is a town where past pride meets present decline, as lofty promises of progress clash with harsh reality. The contrast between the two couldn't be starker, says Dr David McGrogan.
The post Why Is Labour Focusing on Saving the Planet When Birkenhead Is Rapidly Becoming a Third World Slum? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Forget About Climate Change. The Real Existential Threat to the Our Future is Babygeddon Sun Jan 05, 2025 14:00 | Sallust In the Daily Sceptic, Sallust says the West's below replacement level birth rate is a far, far greater threat to our future than climate change. And this depressing Labour Government will only make things worse.
The post Forget About Climate Change. The Real Existential Threat to the Our Future is Babygeddon appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Labour?s ?Anti-Corruption? Minister Spent Years Living in House Given to Her Family by Ally of Forme... Sun Jan 05, 2025 12:02 | Toby Young Labour's anti-corruption minister used to live in a flat gifted to her sister by a political ally of her aunt, the ex-PM of Bangladesh. This is in addition to the flat she was gifted by another ally of her aunt's.
The post Labour?s ?Anti-Corruption? Minister Spent Years Living in House Given to Her Family by Ally of Former Bangladeshi Prime Minister (Who?s Also Her Aunt) appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en
Pentagon could create a second Kurdish state Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:31 | en
How Washington and Ankara Changed the Regime in Damascus , by Thierry Meyssan Tue Dec 17, 2024 06:58 | en
Statement by President Bashar al-Assad on the Circumstances Leading to his Depar... Mon Dec 16, 2024 13:26 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?112 Fri Dec 13, 2024 15:34 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Post Lisbon Referendum – An analysis of the profile and reasons behind why people voted NO.
national |
miscellaneous |
opinion/analysis
Friday July 11, 2008 17:01 by Libertarian
Introduction
The purpose of this article is to evaluate the recent opinion poll carried out by the European commission on the Lisbon treaty result, paying specific attention to NO voters. The focus will not only be on the profile of those who voted NO, but more importantly the reasons behind why they voted No.
An opinion poll carried out by the European commission on the 13th – 14th June was released during the week. The Eurobarometer randomly surveyed 2,000 people to understand 5 main issues:
1. To understand the reasons for non – participation in the referendum
2. To evaluate the respondents views about the campaign
3. To identify the main reasons for ‘yes’ and ‘no’ votes.
4. To get an overall reaction to the result
The main overall findings make for interesting reading, but a lot of it is unsurprising for those who followed the pre and post analysis of the campaign. Whilst many felt there was a significant ‘class’ factor to the NO vote there was very little evidence to illustrate why and how the working and middle class voted.
The main findings are as follows:
1. Most people did not vote because they did not understand what the issues presented.
2. Most voters felt that campaigners used it as an opportunity to promote their own political agenda
3. There were multi dimensional reasons for why people voted NO (outlined below), but Yes voters were more one dimensional (focusing on the benefits Ireland gain from the EU)
4. Those who voted NO were predominantly young people, women, students, the unemployed and manual workers
5. Those who voted Yes were predominantly managers, professionals and retired people
Profile of No voters
The silent majority :
Before analysing why people voted No it is worth noting that 51% of workers (described as employees in the poll) did not vote in the referendum. That is, 6/10 manual workers did not vote. The poll does not clarify whether those surveyed were eligible to vote, i.e. migrant labourers etc. Only 39% of employers or self employed did not vote. Thus, the majority of working class people in Ireland did not vote in the Lisbon referendum and there is no information detailing how they may have voted.
The two main reasons for not voting by both working and professional class were a) lack of knowledge and b) referendum not important to them. 86% of those who did not vote stated that they still supported Ireland’s membership of the EU.
The voting minority:
It is clear that there was a pattern amongst those who voted NO to Lisbon.After analysing the socio demographic groups of who voted NO there is a clear pattern amongst 5 groups. There are listed below
1. 74% of manual workers
2. 72% of students (predominantly from professional backgrounds)
3. 65% of 18 – 24 year olds (Young people)
4. 58% of unemployed
5. 56% of women (mainly those working in the home)
The 5 main supporters of the YES vote where generally male and came from higher socio economic groups
1. 68% of the self employed
2. 66% of senior managers
3. 58% of professionals
4. 57% of those who had completed higher education
5. 51% of men
Reasons behind why they voted No.
However concentrating on the profile of those who voted will not provide us with any clear understanding as to why people voted NO. Common sense can often tell us what ‘social category’ voters fall into. This is not rocket science. It is far better to concentrate on the reasons people why people voted NO (and after analysing the profile we can ask why did the majority of the working class either disengage or vote NO in the referendum).
The two main reasons provided by NO voters are
a) A lack of information (22%)- Democracy
b) To protect Irish identity (12%) – Nationalism
Besides these two main rationales, NO voters (working class it would appear) listed the following in rank order
c) To safeguard Irish neutrality & defence matters (6%)
d) Lack of trust in politicians (6%)
e) Losing the right to an Irish commissioner (6%)
f) Protest against government policies (4%)
g) Protect influence of small states (3%)
h) To stop introduction of abortion (2%)
i) To avoid an influx of immigrants (1%)
An important figure is the 14% of people gave ‘other’ reasons. These are not detailed in the report. Also an important omission was not providing specific workers related issues on the list of options to people to choose from. There was also no mention of people voting NO against a particular type of Europe, i.e. a Neo Liberal Europe. However, it was mentioned that the 14% contained many different responses so it may be several clusters of smaller reasons with no clear observation such as workers rights.
Conclusions and interpretations
Was class a significant factor? Of course class was a significant factor. It is not rocket science to acknowledge different socio – cultural and socio- economic groups vote in particular patterns. However, what is more significant for those wanting to build upon the NO vote is to analyse the reasons why people voted no. Just because the working class voted NO it would be wrong to conclude that this was some a victory for the progressive left in Ireland.
What is positive is the glaringly obvious fact that most people voted NO because they had no part in creating the decision they were being asked to vote on. Thus, it is a victory for grassroots democracy. Also, the fact that the vast majority of people did not vote on the basis of lack of knowledge shows that people will not be herded in like cattle to vote on something they do not understand.
However, most NO voters also pledged support for one of the two main political parties in the country FG & FF. 49% of FG supporters voted No, 40% of FF supporters voted No, 55% of Labour voters voted No and almost 60% of the Greens voted No, 95% of Sinn Fein voters voted No. Hence it shows that not all those who support a political party will follow the ‘party line’. Arguably, this is a positive sign for progressive politics?
What is also obvious (and personally I find this negative) is the grip of ‘national identity’ upon the politics of the working class. If I was in Sinn Fein I would take a lot of positive from this poll. Nationalism was undoubtedly a massive factor for why people voted NO. So, it looks like the retention of a strong Irish identity amongst the working class is still a crucial political concern.
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (3 of 3)
Jump To Comment: 3 2 1Well well well, it appears that even though a higher percentage of people voted against Lisbon being adopted than voted for Barack Obama as president of the Unified States, and much greater than voted for Cowen, Harney and Lenihan, they are not allowed to leave it at that, and now we must vote again, and it seems, again, until the other side get the result the want.
While we may be downhearted about this, let's remember clearly, we did win the referendum on the Lisbon Treaty in 2008. It was a tough fight, but we won fairly and legally.
The poor losers of the other side demanding a re-match is as a clear a judgment on them and their bankruptcy as you could ever want.
But they should be careful- those who close democratic avenues for change should be prepared to accept the consequences of people losing faith in voting and finding other ways to make their voices heard.
'National identity' and 'nationalism' are not the same thing. This is a very superficial 'analysis' imho.
I don't think a strong cultural and national identity amongst Irish working people is a cause for "concern".
Some of us even speak Irish too.