Upcoming Events

National | EU

no events match your query!

New Events


no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds



offsite link The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire

offsite link In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire

offsite link UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović

offsite link US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire

offsite link Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.  We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below). 

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link UN human rights chief calls for priority action ahead of climate summit Sat Oct 30, 2021 17:18 | Human Rights

offsite link 5 Year Anniversary Of Kem Ley?s Death Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:34 | Human Rights

offsite link Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

The Lisbon Treaty and the triumph of technocracy

category national | eu | feature author Saturday July 11, 2009 19:18author by Steve McGiffen - www.spectrezine.orgauthor email spmcgiffen at yahoo dot co dot uk Report this post to the editors

An exclusive article for Indymedia.ie

featured image
Steve McGiffen, Assistant Professor of International Relations

Steve McGiffen is Assistant Professor of International Relations at the American Graduate School of International Relations and Diplomacy in Paris. He is editor of the radical left website Spectre [www.spectrezine.org] and, with Kartika Liotard, MEP, the author of Poisoned Spring: The EU and Water Privatisation (Pluto Press, 2009). Steve can be contacted at spmcgiffen [@] yahoo.co.uk

The Lisbon Treaty is the latest step in a process which, though its conception can arguably be traced to the Treaty of Rome itself, was born at Maastricht. This process is one of removing what is truly of fundamental importance to capitalism – principally, the way in which it manages its economy – from the realm of an at least partially democratised politics.

This is, moreover, not an exclusively European process, but one which is global. As parliamentary institutions have spread following the collapse of authoritarian systems of 'left' and right, they have simultaneously been deprived of a range of powers once considered proper to them.

The nationalist right makes much of the transfer of powers from national to transnational institutions, from Dublin or London to Brussels, for example. Not sharing their 'patriotic' fantasies, I am far more concerned by the transfer of powers from institutions whose nature makes them responsive to popular sentiment, to those essentially immune to such pressures. Not only the European Union, but other regional bodies such as the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement, and international institutions like the World Trade Organisation and the International Monetary Fund, have now narrowed policy choices available to national governments and parliaments to such an extent that 'legitimate' democratic pressure can no longer be brought to bear on the most important areas of policy.

This does not, as yet, represent the complete abolition of democracy, whose continued existence, albeit in shadow form, retains a powerful propaganda function. We are still able to decide for ourselves, as peoples, whether we want legalised abortion, a smoking ban, gay marriage, identity cards and even, as things stand, a socialised system of health care. Yet these issues, though important in themselves, are either subordinate to the economic questions now effectively removed from politics, or not truly controversial within the realm of capital itself. Whether a country has legal abortion or not has few implications for capitalism, which has shown itself capable of adapting to progress towards gender equality. Similarly with the issue of gay marriage. Right-wing views on such matters are mere atavisms, of no fundamental importance to the maintenance of this hyperexploitative system. What really counts is the economy, and the creation and maintenance of conduits for the transfer of public wealth into private hands. Of the issues I mention above, the one which bears most heavily upon this is the question of socialised medicine, which is why the European Commission has, with measures such as the directive on the application of patients' rights in to cross-border healthcare, begun what will become a steady, erosive assault on this cornerstone of a civilised, humane and efficient society.

No issue is immune from removal from the democratised realm in which elected national governments answerable to elected national parliaments continue to exercise real decision-making powers. The Lisbon Treaty's extension of qualified majority voting into several new policy areas, and the concomitant abolition of the national veto in those areas, represent an attempt to narrow the policy choices available to elected politicians still further.

Capitalism faces what may be its greatest ever crisis, one which has been evident to it since the oil shocks of the 1970s. In order to extricate itself from this crisis it needs to increase the rate at which it extracts surplus value from labour. There is no other way, and everything must be subordinated to this. All policy areas must be scrutinised through the lens of corporate capital's economic imperatives. The war on terrorism, another part of the process of undermining the powers of democratically elected institutions, is about creating the structures needed to discipline what is certain to become an increasingly rebellious, troublesome population and workforce. The continued pressure to force member states to accept genetically modified organisms is designed to enhance the control of the food supply by major corporations, as hunger is an even more effective disciplinary tool than a police officer's baton or gun. Whatever else the bank crisis may be, it also represents an opportunity to move wealth from the public purse to private pockets. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan likewise. Because any and every aspect of our lives can be turned into an opportunity to profit, any and every aspect of our lives must eventually be removed from the realm of popular democratic decision-making, or even influence. Governments must cut social spending because Brussels tells them they must, just as Tony Blair took his country into an illegal war because God told him to do it. Popular sovereignty was a fad whose time has passed.

The creation of an independent European Central Bank was thus the thin end of the wedge. Politicians, we are told by those who favour this dictatorship of the bankers, are not for the most part economists; they are vulnerable to their short-term need to win elections; they cannot be trusted to put the public interest before career or party. If all of this disqualifies them from making economic decisions, however, they are surely also unfit to decide on other questions. Abortion, gay marriage? Well, they aren't necessarily lawyers, doctors or philosophers, either, so why let them near such issues? GMOs? What does the average politician know of DNA markers or protein structure, or the relationship between genotype and phenotype? Clearly, if politicians, and by implication the people who elect them, can't be trusted to take decisions about economics, they can scarcely be trusted to take decisions on anything at all. And so, in place of democracy, we now have a developing technocracy, in which decisions of importance are increasingly removed from the elected and given to the appointed.

The European Union's bogus internationalism makes for effective propaganda. I concentrate my own oppositional activity on the EU simply because it is the most powerful distillation of bourgeois hegemony in my part of the world. Its function and philosophy are indistinguishable from other transnational instruments of technocratic rule such as the WTO and IMF. I am equally opposed to these international bodies, yet in presenting my arguments against them I have never once provoked the charge that I am nationalistic, or anti-internationalist. No-one, even their most ardent admirers, has ever to my knowledge tried to romanticise these institutions, to claim that they are responsible for decades of peace, or that they represent a future in which we will all embrace across boundaries of culture and language. Yet such things are said of the European Union all of the time.

A second 'no' vote would, of course, achieve nothing concrete. Ireland would be reviled, the Irish people insulted, the democratic veil worn by the European establishment once more cast aside, and a way found to continue business as usual. It would, however, represent a tremendous blow on the level of propaganda, and thus an important step in the war of position we are obliged to fight, now that power is so diffuse, now that there are no more Winter Palaces to storm. Two centuries of progress towards politically and socially democratic societies are being reversed. At the very least, a no vote would mean that this is not happening with our acquiescence. At best, it might represent the beginnings of an effective progressive movement against this ongoing subversion of everything which underlies the relatively egalitarian prosperity and relatively open societies which have increasingly characterised western Europe since the defeat, in the ruins of Berlin in 1945, of the last attempt to destroy democracy and impose a bogus Union on its peoples.

Steve McGiffen is Assistant Professor of International Relations at the American Graduate School of International Relations and Diplomacy in Paris. He is editor of the radical left website Spectre [www.spectrezine.org] and, with Kartika Liotard, MEP, the author of Poisoned Spring: The EU and Water Privatisation (Pluto Press, 2009). Steve can be contacted at spmcgiffen [@] yahoo.co.uk

Related Link: http://www.spectrezine.org

 #   Title   Author   Date 
   What Fine Gael think of Anti-Lisbon Campaigners     Elsie    Sat Jul 11, 2009 20:42 
   Jim HIggins     old codger    Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:13 
   Don't mind him     V    Sun Jul 12, 2009 13:24 
   on youtube     ads    Sun Jul 12, 2009 20:33 
   Democracy in Europe under threat     Etain    Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:58 
   Reading the Treaty with a biased mind is not useful     Pro Lisbon Lefty    Mon Jul 13, 2009 19:01 
   Suggestion for Pro Lisbon Lefty Mon Jul 13, 2009 19:01     Etain    Mon Jul 13, 2009 19:14 
   According to Montesquieu full realisation of the seperation of powers first emerged in England     Pro Lisbon Lefty    Mon Jul 13, 2009 23:27 
   To Pro Lisbon Lefty @ Mon Jul 13, 2009 23:27     Etain    Tue Jul 14, 2009 08:59 
 10   Do you believe what you are told?     old codger    Tue Jul 14, 2009 14:18 
 11   Debate on the Lisbon Treaty     Roger Cole    Tue Jul 14, 2009 14:43 
 12   Playing Games.     Pete.    Tue Jul 14, 2009 16:07 
 13   Reply to Etain and Roger Cole     Pro Lisbon Lefty    Tue Jul 14, 2009 20:16 
 14   Democracy     Roger Cole    Wed Jul 15, 2009 00:20 
 15   Democracy and Honesty, or, Tyranny and Deception - which is it to be?     Etain    Wed Jul 15, 2009 08:08 
 16   "Pax Romana"     Pete.    Wed Jul 15, 2009 08:13 
 17   Why I will be voting "NO" to the Lisbon Treaty     Etain    Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:57 
 18   @ Pro Lisbon Lefty     Platters    Wed Jul 15, 2009 12:28 
 19   European army     old codger    Wed Jul 15, 2009 15:39 
 20   Respecting polls     Pro Lisbon Lefty    Wed Jul 15, 2009 17:44 
 21   The Lisbon Treaty     Roger Cole    Wed Jul 15, 2009 18:47 
 22   blair     puca    Wed Jul 15, 2009 18:47 
 23   clarification please     puca    Thu Jul 16, 2009 00:28 
 24   Democracy     Roger Cole    Thu Jul 16, 2009 00:31 
 25   Last stand against EU tyranny.     We the People    Thu Jul 16, 2009 01:29 
 26   Pro Lisbon Liar     Topper    Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:44 
 27   Home truths about Lisbon 2     Pro Lisbon Lefty    Thu Jul 16, 2009 21:36 
 28   To Pro Lisbon Lefty at Thu Jul 16, 2009 21:36     Etain    Fri Jul 17, 2009 12:05 
 29   we are not being forced to vote     old codger    Fri Jul 17, 2009 15:15 
 30   Government is fully within its rights to propose a rerun     Pro Lisbon Lefty    Fri Jul 17, 2009 21:00 
 31   Lisbon is pretty simple if you know where you stand.     Sarah    Sat Jul 18, 2009 09:29 
 32   To Pro Lisbon Lefty at Fri Jul 17, 2009 21:00     Etain    Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:01 
 33   final appeal     punter    Sat Jul 18, 2009 15:31 
 34   Final appeal does not equate to referenda     Pro on Lisbon Lefty    Sat Jul 18, 2009 21:32 
 35   Incorrect..pro-lisbon lefty..     Sarah    Sat Jul 18, 2009 23:12 
 36   Reply to Sarah     Pro Lisbon Lefty    Sun Jul 19, 2009 17:06 
 37   ???     Peter    Sun Jul 19, 2009 18:39 
 38   Less cranky today -Pro Lisbon lefty     Sarah    Sun Jul 19, 2009 19:30 
 39   Couldn't find this earlier..on the ECJ     Sarah    Sun Jul 19, 2009 21:57 
 40   riks of isolation at a bad time     Pro Lisbon Lefty    Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:34 
 41   Interesting Debate     Mark C    Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:57 
 42   against lobbyismus     plutokratie isn`t democratie    Sat Sep 26, 2009 15:24 

Number of comments per page
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy