Washington Asked Russia to Keep US Respo... Sun Jan 23, 2022 18:07 | TASS
CIA Says ‚ÄėHavana Syndrome‚Äô Was a Con... Sun Jan 23, 2022 15:47 | Julian E. Barnes
Why Has Austria Become a Freedom Shithol... Sun Jan 23, 2022 12:42 | Alex Story
Why Did So Many Doctors Become Nazis? Sun Jan 23, 2022 10:24 | Ashley K. Fernandes
3-Year-Old Dies in Argentina From Heart ... Sun Jan 23, 2022 08:54 | Raymond Wolfe
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Moveable Feast Cafe 2022/01/23 ? Open Thread Sun Jan 23, 2022 16:30 | herb
2022/01/23 16:30:01Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
What Next? Sun Jan 23, 2022 09:52 | amarynth
Tarik in the Vineyard for the Saker Blog I’m not sure even a NATO mosquito could cross the Russian border unmolested. And when a bear is lethally threatened, it doesn’t
An aftermath of Washington Post ? Zelensky interview Sat Jan 22, 2022 20:10 | The Saker
by Lilia Shumkova for the Saker blog On December 8, 2021, days before Russia presented to the U.S. its Draft of the proposed Treaty between The United States of America
Response to the US Department of State?s fact sheet: Facts vs. Fiction: Russian Disinformation on Uk... Sat Jan 22, 2022 18:05 | amarynth
From the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation.† On January 20, @StateDept released a “fact sheet” (https://is.gd/QBgF3i) on the so-called Russian disinformation on Ukraine???? ?? Nothing written in
BBC HardTalk: Marandi on Vienna Nuclear Talks Sat Jan 22, 2022 09:38 | amarynth
University of Tehran Professor Seyed Mohammad Marandi explains the JCPOA, western sanctions against Iran and Iranians as well as Iran’s response to US military threats on BBC HardTalk. Ed Note:†
The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
Irish media mote in the eye
King Hammurabi: Builders law Anthony
Michael Clifford: low standards in journalism Anthony
Are the wheels of justice creaking into action? Anthony
Middle class revolution Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Voltaire, international edition
US bombings in Syria and Iraq violate US Constitution Thu Jan 20, 2022 08:28 | en
Hillary's comeback? Thu Jan 20, 2022 07:56 | en
NATO expands its membership unwittingly (Ben Wallace) Thu Jan 20, 2022 06:52 | en
In the 1980s, the Pentagon was preparing a nuclear war in Iran Wed Jan 19, 2022 17:06 | en
Iran reopens office at OIC Headquarters afer 6 years Wed Jan 19, 2022 08:51 | en
Voltaire Network >>
Support The Workers Of Amber Womenís Refuge.
Workers begin action to save vital service to women...
The workers at the Amber Womenís Refuge in Kilkenny began picketing their place of work this week to highlight the impact of the austerity cuts on the service they provide. This interview was conducted earlier in the week with Claire OíNeill of the Amber Womenís Refuge Centre.
Amber Women's Refuge
Q: For those who donít know, where is the Amber Womenís Refuge Centre and what work does it do?
A: The Amber Refuge Centre in is Kilkenny. We provide accommodation to women and children who are experiencing domestic violence in their lives, and also to adult females who, through no fault of their own, find themselves homeless. We provide accommodation to women as well as a care plan for those who look for help from us. We try to look after the women and children as much as possible so that they can find their feet in what is a very difficult situation for them. We also operate a 24-hour-a-day helpline for women in distress.
Q How long has the Centre been in existence?
A: Amber opened its doors in 2001. Previous to that we operated a drop-in centre in Kilkenny. Initially a very committed group of women got together to help other women who were suffering domestic violence. They understood the need that was there and fought tirelessly for a proper service to be put in place. They eventually got the money together and in 2001 at the culmination of their efforts we opened the doors to the women and children. Since then the need has increased every year and Centreís services are in constant demand.
Q: You are part of a national network also. What is that?
A: Each womenís refuge is Ireland is actually independently run. They are run by a voluntary board of management, or at least ours is. But Safe Ireland is the umbrella organization that we all work under. Safe Ireland provides national statistics and they also work at advocacy for changing the laws and the like. We work with them and under their guidance.
Q: How long have worked at the Centre, Claire?
A: Iíve been with the Womenís Refuge from back when we had just a drop in centre in Kilkenny. So I've been there since day one, you could say.
Q: The situation now is that a serious dispute has arisen at the Centre and you are looking for support. Can you outline how this has come about and what the dispute is about?
A: We all know the economic climate is bad. Because of that this situation has arisen. We have all taken the wage cuts that have been imposed since the crash. But the cuts in funding are now having a huge impact on the service itself. They are impacting directly on us and in particular on the staff team that operates the Amber Refuge. Five people were made redundant last Sunday. Our administrator was let go about a month ago. Now they are implementing a new roster and this will result in at least five more losing their jobs. Apart from this dreadful situation we are also now facing into a work situation that we oppose whole-heartedly.
Q: Is it this that has caused the current dispute?
A: Yes. Due to the latest staff cuts we will be lone workers at the Centre which is not something we would want to advertise ever. We will be expected to work alone to look after up to seven families at any given time. Not only that, but we will also need to run a help line, run the house itself, monitor health and safety and maintain the safety of the families. It is just not on. At any time we can angry husbands banging on the door looking for their wives. This is not a healthy situation for anyone. It is not good and we donít think we can provide an adequate service with just one person on duty.
Q: The Centreís finances are in crisis?
A: For sure. We are not denying this and no one is. We have all been aware of this and last year in fact we, as workers at the Centre, got together to suggest various ways in which money could be saved at the Centre. At the time we put a lot of good ideas forward because we knew what the Centre did and we knew how to run it. But these have not been listened to. Instead management brought in a consultant and this consultant has produced a report that is now being used to justify this latest disastrous change in the rosters.
Q: Were you involved with the consultantís report at all?
A: We did take part in that review. But we werenít told what the purpose of the review was in the first place. So we were in the dark. The review has not been formally released although the Bord of Management received it in June. In fact we are going to be told about its full contents on Friday coming. But in the meantime some of the consultantís reportís recommendations have been implemented! Including the recommendation that we lose our shift attendants and in effect become lone workers at the Centre.
Q: So the specific proposal about working alone was arrived at by the consultant employed by management?
A: Correct. From what we know there appears to be nothing in his report about what we the workers proposed in terms of cost savings. There are strange things in it, from what we know. For example the consultantís report suggests that we become more of an appoiment based service. Now that is just not feasible when you consider the crisis situation that some of the women that come to us are in. If we have a lady who comes to us, she has maybe been thinking about this for ages and she might just decide to act finally. If you have an n appointment system, where are you? I just donít know how that could work with someone in a crisis. Does it make sense?
Q But management are adamant.
A: We have already lost five shift attendants. They were give notice early last week. So right now we are facing a situation where we are working alone. We are trying to maintain the service but this is a very difficult situation. That is why we have to take action. We want to highlight the situation and we need support.
Q: What is the situation with other women refuges in the country?
A: The situation we are in here in Kilkenny is a complete exception. There are 19 refuges in network and right now none are operating under this sort of regime. There is one centre with something similar but it isnít normal at all to have lone workers on shifts because it is not safe. The people we have talked to in the others refuges are horrified about what is being suggested for the Amber Refuge.
Q: Since Monday you have taken action?
A: Yes, we are picketing for two hours during part of the day at the Centre in Kilkenny. We are calling it industrial action but we are not asking people to stop work and stop the operation of the centre. No one wants to do that. But we know too that we must highlight our case. The picketing is about hightlighting our situation.
Q: So people can come along during the picketing and join in. What else can they do?
A: Spread the word about our situation. Write to the newspapers. Support us on Facebook. Get onto your TDs and express your dissatisfaction with this. Look, letís be clear here. This is an essential service and a service that we vitally need. If we are prepared to cut services of this sort to people who are in need of help, then where are we going in this society? We need to stop this. The point here also is that if this is successful at the Amber Womenís Refuge Centre then it will become the norm in other refuges and other help centreís also.
Q: How you do you see the situation being resolved?
A: We have tried time and again to talk and discuss the future of the service with management. We know how vital the service is and we know how it needs to be run. We know that money is tight now but there are ways to make savings that donít simply mean penalising us as the workers and destroying the service in the process. We, as the workers, are vital to the running of this service and our rights also must be respected. Dialogue is not such a big thing to ask for, it is? Right now we canít accept being dictated to especially when it is destroying the service. Dialogue is the way forward. It isnít right that we as workers are being treated as if we had no say in this. We do and we are determined not to be bullied. So dialogue and a common understanding must be the outcome and the solution. It is us the workers who are being made to pay for this crisis. In turn the service itself is being place in jeopardy. This should not be allowed happen. Support us!