New Events


no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds



offsite link The Swiss Force a Referendum Challenging... Sun Jan 17, 2021 03:57 | Sam Jones

offsite link US Chief of Naval Operations: Shipbuildi... Sat Jan 16, 2021 13:48 | Paul McLeary

offsite link The Flu Has Dropped Off From the Face of... Sat Jan 16, 2021 11:01 | Marko Marjanović

offsite link A Short History of How Anthony Fauci Has... Sat Jan 16, 2021 09:22 | Ilya Feoktistov

offsite link America’s Biggest Owner of Farmland Is... Sat Jan 16, 2021 08:21 | The Daily Mail

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link China Newsbrief and Sitrep Sun Jan 17, 2021 15:39 | amarynth
By Godfree Roberts ? selected from his extensive weekly newsletter : Here Comes China You can get it here:  https://www.herecomeschina.... We start the regular sitrep with Godfree’s new book Why

offsite link The American Brumaire Sun Jan 17, 2021 11:34 | amarynth
by Francis Lee for the Saker Blog During the late nineteenth century, the United States was the world?s most advanced capitalist country. According to orthodox (and I emphasise orthodox) Marxist theory this should have

offsite link Washington?s Bastille Sat Jan 16, 2021 18:13 | amarynth
by Jimmie Moglia for the Saker Blog Trump?s supporters, having found the vanity of conjecture and inefficacy of expectations, resolved to prove their own existence, if not by violence, at

offsite link Joe Biden?s War Sat Jan 16, 2021 14:27 | amarynth
Written by J.Hawk exclusively for SouthFront The 2000 presidential race being done and over, except for the tens of millions of Americans who believe the election was stolen and a

offsite link Trump?s not-so-secret art of containing China Sat Jan 16, 2021 11:20 | amarynth
by Pepe Escobar with permission and first posted at Asia Times. It was hardly a secret throughout the Trump administration. Now, dying embers within sight, and with minimum fanfare, comes

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Mainstream media: Failing to speak truth to power

offsite link David Quinn’s selective tolerance Anthony

offsite link A Woulfe in judges clothing Anthony

offsite link Sarah McInerney and political impartiality Anthony

offsite link Did RTE journalists collude against Sinn Fein? Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Spirit of Contradiction

offsite link The Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason

offsite link On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan

offsite link What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith

offsite link The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith

offsite link Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh

Spirit of Contradiction >>

Potential of movement against water charges.

category international | bin tax / household tax / water tax | opinion/analysis author Monday November 24, 2014 22:31author by john throne - Facts for working people Report this post to the editors

Anti water charges movement: tens and tens of thousands of working class and youth on to the streets.

Tens and tens of thousands of Irish workers and youth have taken to the streets and confronted the government and the state. What is the nature of this movement and what is its potential? Should it just be seen as a movement to bring down this government and replace it with another government. Or should it be seen as having the potential to bring down the system and replace it with another system.

Sean Throne I support enthusiastically the militant stand of the SP in the water charges struggle. In doing so I would also like to say that I think that it would be important that the SP from its position of increased influence take the lead in building a united front of mass direct action as has been emerging on the ground with the protests all over the country. Part of this is to put aside old conflicts and sectarianism and seek to unite the revolutionary left, such as the SP itself, the United Left, PBP, Clare D, Joan C, and other left and activist groups, into a revolutionary socialist current that puts forward its ideas in the movement as it develops.

What is the objective situation in Ireland now. In the CWI/SP when I was in it we used to try and analyze the objective situation and from that decide on strategy and tactics. So I would like to ask this question: Is there a revolutionary situation in Southern Ireland now? This would be where the ruling class is split, the working class is showing it is prepared to fight for power, the middle class is vacillating and there exists a mass revolutionary force prepared to lead. I do not think this exists. I think it would be a mistake to think it does. However this is not the end of the story.

Elements of this situation do exist. There are splits within the capitalist class and its parties. The working class is confronting the government and the state if not yet confronting capitalism consciously. Sections of the middle layers are vacillating. The question I would like to pose is can progress be made to strengthen and develop these elements which go to create a revolutionary situation.

One element that could certainly be strengthened is the building of a revolutionary force if the revolutionary left groups could get over their sectarianism and come together. This is possible if the left can break from its sectarianism. There are many many thousands of workers and youth in an out of left groups which could be brought together. There are many who have been through the left groups and been disgusted by their sectarianism. There are many who would join a revolutionary left force if they could see one which they were convinced was not sectarian.

If these forces could be brought together, if such a force could be built, the working class could then be assisted in moving to confront the system. Such an influential revolutionary left could win to its ranks the most combative and conscious workers and youth. This force could then orient to the mass of the working class on the following strategy and program: Build committees of workers and youth against the water charges in every workplace, union locals, district and trades councils, communities, schools and colleges, all decisions to be taken by these committees by democratic vote, these committees to fight against the water charges but also to fight for the cancellation of all debts to the banks and finance houses and the taking into democratic public ownership of the banks and finance houses and all oil and gas wealth and all major industry and from this establish a rebuilding fund from which to rebuild and solve the problems of the country. Such a lead by a non sectarian left force would see its influence dramatically. It could win over the most active and combative working class forces, orient these to the mass of the working class and build a revolutionary working class that could change things fundamentally.

This movement could also be given a direction that would extend outside the South of Ireland. Similar struggles are threatening in the North. Similar struggles are threatening in England, Scotland and Wales and throughout Europe. This movement can be developed into an international movement.

The only questions i have about the statement from the SP are these. First: What does it say about and what does it suggest it will do about bringing together the many many revolutionary socialists both in and out of organizations into a mass revolutionary organization which can give leadership and seek to challenge the capitalist system and its austerity program. Second: While raising the issue of the next election is correct i do not think it is sufficient. I think that there is the possibility of building a movement to challenge capitalism in the present situation and this will not be done if we confine our strategy and tactics and program within the confines of reforming the capitalist system, or winning a majority in the Dail, (this is where the building of the committees comes in they already exist in embryo form in the anti water charges committees) and within the borders of the South of Ireland. It will not be done if we set our sights only on the next election and how many seats the left can win. It is a very serious mistake not to develop the committees to be the base of the struggle and that all decisions be taken democratically by these committees.

Finally the same question again: Could a revolutionary situation be developed if the left forces got over their sectarianism, came together and sought to win the most combative and thinking workers and youth and oriented these to the mass of the workers and to the middle layers around a democratic anti capitalist socialist program and internationalism. Sean Throne.

Related Link:
author by Mike Novackpublication date Tue Nov 25, 2014 14:44author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"Finally the same question again: Could a revolutionary situation be developed if the left forces got over their sectarianism, came together and sought to win the most combative and thinking workers and youth and oriented these to the mass of the workers and to the middle layers around a democratic anti capitalist socialist program and internationalism."

Based on what we've seen for over more than just my lifetime, little prospect of that. The myriad left factions all seem more interested in fighting each other for recruits to their individual vision of the best approach. Close to zero willingness to ignore (what should be considered minor) differences in the cause of unity. After all, if you win, little reason to bicker that another approach would have been even better.

But please note something very important. Saying that you can get masses united together (recognizing that this is a prerequisite) puts a different approach on the usefulness of parliamentary means. IF you have the vast majority behind you (in a society where voting is possible) then it's up to the other side to try force to disrupt you taking over by parliamentary means. It's the side that DOESN'T have enough ballots that has to try bullets.

Also recognize that it requires MUCH more means to take over a society (replace the ruling order with your own) than it does to disrupt the ruling order. So just looking to accumulate enough to bring down the current version of the capitalist order may not be enough UNLESS you have REASON to believe that it will be your vision that becomes the replacement. Please take careful note of my use of REASON as opposed to quasi-religious faith. A quasi religious ideology that presumes there is only one possible path for history isn't reason no matter how many sacred texts declare it. If the history of the 20th Century (and earliest 21st) teaches us anything it should be that fascism and/or religious fundamentalism can turn out to be the winners when societies collapse in conflict.

© 2001-2021 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy